Runbooks for agentic coding · 2026

Linear ships tickets.
Factory ships droids.
Flownex ships runbooks.

The shared runbook layer for any engineering team using AI agents. Design a template once on the canvas — every engineer reruns the same bounded workflow through whichever agent they prefer (Gemini, Claude, Cursor, Copilot), with human checkpoints and an audit trail your tech lead can actually trust.

Tickets · roadmaps · sprints
LINEAR / JIRA / NOTION
Workflow templates · checkpoints · audit
Agents that actually write the code
FACTORY / CURSOR / GEMINI / CLAUDE
Vendor MCPs — data and actions
JIRA · FIGMA · GITHUB · SLACK · FIREBASE
The shape of the product

A shared runbook your agents can follow.

You don't write code for your integrations. You draw them on a canvas. A trigger, a chain of steps, a human approval, an outcome — saved as a template your whole team can re-run on any ticket, through any agent. That's what mobile teams have been missing from AI-assisted SDLC.

ANDROID BUG FIX FLOW · live
Trigger · new Jira ticket in PROD-BUGS
JIRA
Scope · app/src/main/** · read ticket context
FLOWNEX
Agent · Gemini Agent generates diff
YOUR LLM
Checkpoint · tech lead approves plan
HUMAN
Build · <your build command> · tests green
LOCAL
PR · open · label flownex-generated
GITHUB
Deliver · <your distribution target> + Slack notify
CD
For every engineering team

Nodes surface based on the tools your team picks.

You don't configure nodes up front. You tell Flownex which stack you ship and which tools you use — the canvas palette reshapes. Mobile, web, backend, infra, data. Starter runbooks ship pre-wired so you're running one in minutes, then fork and customise.

M
MOBILE
Android · iOS · KMP · Flutter · RN
W
WEB
React · Vue · Svelte · Next · Astro
B
BACKEND
Node · Python · Go · Rust · Java
X
CROSS-PLATFORM
Monorepos · infra · data · ML
Starter runbooks ship per stack: Crash-to-PR, Figma-to-UI, Dependency bump, REST endpoint, Database migration, Beta release, Infra change. Fork any on the canvas. Share with your team.
Three approaches

Different layers, not competing products

Every sensible engineering stack in 2026 will have all three. The question is who owns the seam between them.

Linear
Issue tracker · roadmap

Best-in-class ticketing. Rich roadmaps, cycles, triage. Their new AI adds ticket drafting and sub-issue generation — but execution still lives somewhere else.

  • StrongTicket lifecycle, sprint planning, roadmap view
  • WeakDoesn't execute code changes. No agent orchestration.
  • BuyerProduct managers + team leads
  • LayerSystem of record for what needs to happen
Factory.ai
Autonomous droids

"Drop-in AI engineers." Their droids run multi-step dev tasks end-to-end autonomously on their own infrastructure. Fast for self-contained work, but locked to their platform and their model choices.

  • StrongAutonomous execution on well-scoped tasks
  • WeakSingle-agent (theirs). No team roles, no shared templates, no BYOK.
  • BuyerSolo engineers, small teams willing to hand off control
  • LayerA specific agent implementation
Flownex
Workflow layer · MCP-native

The conductor between your tickets and your agents. Define repeatable templates — 7 phases, configurable nodes, human checkpoints — then run them from whatever agent each engineer prefers. One workflow, many hosts.

  • StrongTemplates, checkpoints, role-based admin, audit trail
  • Works withGemini, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Copilot — via MCP
  • BuyerEngineering managers + tech leads who need team visibility
  • LayerThe repeatable workflow above any agent
The agentic coding stack

Four layers. We live in the one nobody else owns.

Every layer has a vendor. Only the workflow layer is empty — everyone assumes either ticketing or the agent should cover it. Neither does.

L4 · Intent
Tickets and intent
Linear · Jira · Notion · GitHub Issues · Shortcut
System of record
L3 · Workflow
Templates, phases, checkpoints, audit
Flownex · (nobody else)
That's us
L2 · Agent
The thing that actually writes code
Factory droids · Cursor · Gemini Agent · Claude Desktop · Copilot · Devin
LLM + orchestrator
L1 · Tools
MCP servers — data and actions
Jira MCP · Figma MCP · GitHub MCP · Slack MCP · Firebase MCP · shell · filesystem · git
Vendor nouns
Honest comparison

Who covers what

Every tool here is excellent at what it does. This matrix is about scope, not quality — where do capabilities actually live?

Capability Linear Factory.ai Cursor / Copilot Flownex
Tickets + roadmap INT
Agent executes code changes VIA
Reusable workflow templates ISSUE DROID
Human-in-the-loop checkpoints SOME
Works with any agent (BYOK hosts)
Team roles + multi-party approval
Immutable audit trail LOG
Stack-agnostic workflow layer (any agent, any stack)

full support  ·  INT via integration  ·  not in scope

Why this layer, why now

The four gaps we fill

Repeatable across your team

Cursor and Factory give your best engineer a 10× boost — and leave four others guessing. Flownex templates encode "how our team ships an Android bug fix" so every engineer gets the same quality path, the same checkpoints, the same review standards.

Human checkpoints, by construction

Autonomous agents race to a PR. Regulated teams can't ship that way. Flownex templates pause at phase boundaries you define — plan approved, scope approved, diff approved — and resume when a reviewer clicks. Safety isn't a setting, it's in the template.

Any agent, not ours

Gemini in Android Studio, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code — whatever each engineer is paying for. Flownex runs as an MCP server; the host calls our tools to orchestrate. No forced agent, no forced LLM, no forced IDE. You bring the hands.

Audit that holds up in review

Every phase transition, every checkpoint decision, every LLM call summary lands in an immutable, hash-chained event log. Your compliance team sees the exact history. Your tech lead sees who approved what. Your PM sees velocity. Same source of truth.

The ecosystem

One workflow, every vendor's MCP

Vendors ship MCPs for nouns — "read this Jira ticket," "fetch this Figma frame," "open this PR." Flownex is the verb that conducts them in the right order.

FLOWNEX
WORKFLOW MCP
Jira
Linear
GitHub
Figma
Firebase
Slack
Shell
FS
Git
Sentry
Notion
Play
One Flownex key · every vendor's MCP · every host's agent

You already have the tickets.
You already have the agent.

You're missing the workflow layer that makes them work together — for every engineer, every ticket, every phase. That's us. Up to 3 engineers, free forever.

Start free See pricing